|
|
|
SELLING
OUT Page 3
The
Fan
Since
fans are obviously an essential part of the equation, how can
a fan be defined?
Again, a separation must be made to differentiate between people
who like to listen to music and those who are active followers
of a genre or artist. People that like to have the radio on, have
a favorite CD, or even occasionally go to concerts should not
be automatically referred to as fans. Surely these people would
call themselves fans but for separation sake, they will be referred
to as casual listeners. To be more specific, casual listeners
are generally those who those who might answer "oh, I don't
know, I like lots of stuff" to the question, "What is
your favorite song or album?". To elaborate, casual listeners
find no problem identifying with performers (as I previously defined)
or musical artists. More specifically, casual listeners are often
aware of the aspect of their conformity in the music industry
that Dick Hebdige cites in Style as Homology and Signifying Practice
(1979) and they just aren't concerned about it (Frith).
Fans
are more intense in their love for good music. They find themselves
associated with a sub-culture that might or might not at the given
time be in the mainstream. As Gary Clarke notes in his cynical
yet true account Defening Ski-Jumpers (1981), sub-cultures will
always exist and always be taken advantage of (Frith). Thus it
is important to distinguish that fans are not the kind to attach
themselves to a short term trend, only to hop on a new bandwagon
only months later. In other words, a fan of grunge music is not
someone who owned Nirvana's Nevermind album but is now into Matchbox
20. A grunge fan is one who was into the Meatpuppets and Mother
Love Bone, was thrilled when Nirvana and others got their moment,
and is still around even though grunge's moment in the mainstream
has long past. Fans are the ones who will make or break a "musical
artist" not a performer.
The
most important thing to note about fans is their connection to
their musical genre or artist. The connection is often deep, and
thus the feelings are profound if a trust is betrayed. Fans are
often times not understanding of why "their" band made
a certain move, while artists are often confused as to why "their"
fans react in a certain manner. The relationship is codependent.
Without one, the other suffers.
As
David Riesman states of defining fans in Listening to Popular
Music (1950), "the danger exists then of assuming that the
other audience, the audience one does not converse with, is more
passive, more manipulated, more vulgar in taste, than may be the
case" (Frith). In other words that the casual listener is
less important than a true fan. Again, the point here is to differentiate
that the casual listener and the fan are separate entities, not
to say that one is more important than the other.
Now
that the artist/fan relationship has been properly defined, we
can move forward to conceptualize how this relationship directly
determines what selling out is. Rather than take the side of either
the artist or the fan and push for change that will never occur,
we can objectively look at the facts of today's industry and see
how the artist/fan relationship directs it.
Page
1 of Selling Out
Page 2 of Selling Out
Page 3 of Selling Out
Page 4 of Selling Out
Page 5 of Selling Out
Page 6 of Selling Out
|