|
|
|
SELLING
OUT
Written
by Michael Black
It
is always the same old story. A music fan falls in love with a
little-known, hard-working band that they claim to be the "next
big thing". The band puts in long hours trying to build a
buzz and spread their music. As the band gradually constructs
a following, the fan proudly claims, "I was listening to
these guys from the beginning". Finally, the band breaks;
they are the "next big thing". The same band that gave
the fan an outlet from the staleness of modern music now is modern
music. "Their" band is now being consumed by the masses.
As the fan sees his individuality slipping through his fingers
and struggles to find his once unique identity, he manages to
muster a final, resentful cry, "Sell Outs!".
The
story never changes. Music fans are a righteous group that are
out to protect their own self-identity. Naturally, "selling
out" is a term that is viewed as purely negative in its connotation
by the fans and the artists, yet its use is often haphazardly
thrown about without proper analysis by the fan in regard to an
artist's intent. Despite its bad name, selling out has a positive
side
being heard. After all, if Dylan never sold out and
went electric, fans everywhere might still today think of rock
and roll as messageless music with a groovy beat. So then what
exactly is selling out? Can one even be heard today without selling
out? Must selling out be labeled good or bad? These are all questions
that trouble many artists and fans. In fact, the very concept
of selling out deals directly with the relationship between artists
and their fans. In turn, to even start to establish the nuances
of selling out, one must first properly establish the artist and
the fan as separate entities.
Page 1 of Selling Out
Page 2 of Selling Out
Page 3 of Selling Out
Page 4 of Selling Out
Page 5 of Selling Out
Page 6 of Selling Out
|