|
|
|
Bound
for Glory (page 2)
Individuality
indeed played a major role in the success of Franklin and Douglass. As a young
man, Franklin was so unique that he often "was chide for [his] singularity"2.
Douglass had a distinctive character that few slaves could boast, his intentions
were simple, "I prefer to be true to myself" (56). This individuality,
or what Franklin called "selfhood", seeded from a lack of roots. Slaves,
including Douglas, often split from their families at birth and were fortunate
to ever see them again. Similarly, Franklin had a family but left home at a young
age to seek employment after being disowned by his brother (43). Their individuality
drove them to break from their predestined paths (i.e. printer and slave) and
live their lives in the manner that they chose, creating their own ideas on topics
ranging from freedom to religion. Franklin
and Douglass' philosophies on religion had haunting similarities. Both had a naturally
skeptical personality in part due to their upbringing. They thought of religion
as a pure thing that was tarnished by the institution of the church. Franklin
thought that, "not a single moral Principle was inculcated or enforc'd, their
Aim seeming to be rather to make us Presbyterians than good Citizens" (89).
Along the same line, Douglass spoke angrily about how slave-holders could change
their whole persona for the Sabbath stating, "I love the pure, peaceable,
and impartial Christianity of Christ: I therefore hate the corrupt, slaveholding,
women-whipping, cradle-plundering, partial and hypocritical Christianity of this
land" (84). Again, neither denounced faith or religion. Franklin was a more
moral man than most church going citizens; he even went as far as trying to eliminate
all of his vises one by one. Bound
for Glory page 1 Bound
for Glory page 2 Bound for
Glory page 3 Bound for Glory
page 4 Bound for Glory page
5
|
|